improved the adr skill on latest session and after ai feedback. removed dependency on other skill

skills/adr-brainstorm/SKILL.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: adr-brainstorm
-description: "Brainstorm with the user about a new ADR. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any combination of 'adr' and 'brainstorm' in their trigger phrase.
+description: "Brainstorm with the user about a new ADR. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any combination of 'adr' and 'brainstorm' in their trigger phrase."
-dependencies: "Dependend on the Grill-me skill by Matt Pocock"
 ---
 
 An ADR is an Architecture Decision Record. Such a record contains a decision on the architecture or design for the application landscape the user is maintaining.
@@ -11,18 +10,83 @@ The goal of the ADR is to provide an architectural solution or a design solution
 
 Below, the brainstorm session is mapped out in multiple steps. Each step must be completed succesfully, before continuing to the next step. Success means reaching a shared understanding and whatever the step entitles as its success criteria. 
 
-When interviewing the user, use the skill-tool "grilling" that comes with the grill-me-skill to come to a shared understanding. If the grill-me skill is missing, ask the user for permission to install the grill-me skill by Matt Pocock.
-
 If the user, or the relevant ADR, indicates that an ADR is to supersede another ADR, read that ADR first.
 
+## Explore decisions with the user
+
+### Follow a design tree
+
+Map the architectural question as a design tree: each decision may
+introduce dependent decisions. Track which decisions are agreed,
+open, awaiting factual investigation, or explicitly deferred.
+
+Ask dependent questions only after their prerequisites are settled.
+Revisit earlier decisions when new evidence changes their assumptions,
+and explain which dependent decisions need reconsideration.
+
+Keep the tree within the ADR's agreed scope. Suggest follow-up work
+for independent topics rather than continually expanding the ADR.
+A deferred topic must have a clear boundary and must not leave the
+main decision ambiguous.
+
+Finish when the user has agreed on the architectural decision and its material tradeoffs. Identify remaining implementation questions as follow-up work. Do not leave questions open that could materially change the chosen approach.
+
+### Establish facts before asking for decisions
+
+Finding accessible facts is the agent's responsibility. Inspect relevant
+code, configuration, specifications, ADRs, and authoritative documentation
+before asking the user questions those sources can answer.
+
+Distinguish observed facts, assumptions, recommendations, and decisions.
+Cite sources for material factual claims and explain uncertainty where
+evidence is unavailable or conflicting. Ask the user for requirements,
+priorities, constraints, and knowledge unavailable from accessible sources.
+
+Evaluate alternatives against the agreed requirements. Present credible
+alternatives fairly, including drawbacks of the recommended approach.
+Do not infer that an option is unsuitable merely because the current
+implementation uses something else.
+
+### Keep the conversation collaborative
+
+Use short rounds, usually one main question or a few closely related
+questions. Number questions when asking more than one. Do not ask every
+available question at once if that would hinder discussion.
+
+For decision questions, normally provide a recommended answer and its
+reason. Where natural, phrase the question so "yes" clearly accepts that
+recommendation. Make its scope explicit; avoid combining independent
+decisions into one yes/no question.
+
+Use open questions when discovering requirements or when a recommendation
+would prematurely narrow the discussion. Allow disagreement, alternatives,
+and back-and-forth exploration before seeking a decision.
+
+### Leave architectural decisions with the user
+
+The agent investigates, explains tradeoffs, challenges assumptions, and
+recommends. The user selects the architectural approach and accepts its
+material tradeoffs.
+
+Do not treat silence, a factual answer, or agreement on one decision as
+approval of other decisions. Preserve earlier agreements without repeatedly
+requesting confirmation unless their meaning or supporting facts change.
+
+At meaningful milestones, summarize the agreed decisions and remaining
+questions. Before finalizing the ADR, confirm shared understanding of the
+complete proposal. Keep recommendations and unresolved assumptions out of
+the Decisions section until the user accepts them.
+
+### Guide the process through steps
+
 Coöperate with the user via the following steps. Communicate each step in which step you are, and what the step entails. Use the template adr-template.md as a template for the final ADR. 
 
 The _first step_ is to get to a shared understanding of the probived context and the problem area the user is in need for a decision. Success for step one means you can describe the context in one to fifty sentences.
 
-The _second step_ is to get to two to four different architectural solutions or design solutions for the described context. Every solution needs a short description of one to fifty sentences and a list of one to ten pro's and one to ten con's. Any consequences to the current landscape that may be discussed, should be kept for _step four_. 
+The _second step_ is to get to two to four different architectural solutions or design solutions for the described context. Every solution needs a short description of one to fifty sentences and a list of one to ten pro's and one to ten con's. allow discussion of consequences when they affect the choice. Record them formally in _step four_, but don’t postpone discovering migration costs or operational burdens until after selecting an option.
 Success for step two means there are more than one credible solutions with a set of relevant pro's and con's by which a user is able to choose, or not choose that solution for the next step.
 
-The _third step_ is to pick the best solution. Ths user must decide what solution he prefers. The choosen solution will be presented as the ADR desision. A decision may branch into a small tree of related desisions, small meaning one to five levels deep. Make sure that you come to a shared understanding of what the desision entails, what relates to it, an when it fully described, clear of any ambiguity. Success of step three means there is a shared understanding of the choosen solution and what it entails.
+The _third step_ is to pick the best solution. Ths user must decide what solution he prefers. The choosen solution will be presented as the ADR decision. A decision may branch into a small tree of related decisions, small meaning one to five levels deep. Make the architectural decision, its scope, and its material tradeoffs unambiguous; record remaining implementation questions as follow-up work. Success of step three means there is a shared understanding of the choosen solution and what it entails.
 
 The _fourth step_ is to make clear what the consequences will be for the application landscape. Success of step four means there is a clear understanding of the changes that should be made to software landscape and the way futurue work should be implemented. 
 

skills/adr-brainstorm/adr-template.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-**ID:** <insert number> \
+**ID:** <insert ADR followed by a unique number> \
 **Title:** <insert short and descriptive title> \
 **Supersedes:** - \
 **Status:** NEW \